[ad_1]
Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin’s weblog submit highlighting the threats he sees that artificial intelligence (AI) may pose to humanity has attracted a slew of fiery responses from AI and blockchain group members.
On Nov. 27, Buterin revealed a weblog submit titled “My techno-optimism,” which mentioned how AI is “essentially totally different” from different innovations like weapons, airplanes and social media. Moreover, Buterin defined that it may develop a brand new type of “thoughts,” which may work in opposition to people and become the new apex species.
The weblog submit attracted discussions on varied fronts and sparked totally different sentiments on X (previously Twitter). Some voiced their settlement with the Ethereum founder, whereas others shared their criticisms of the submit.
An X account referred to as Emergent Perspective, which focuses on occasions within the web age, replied that they agree with Buterin’s ideas on the weblog submit. Based on the X person, individuals who argue that optimistic intentions can assure that AI “can do no hurt” scare them. “That has been true of completely nothing in human historical past, and this won’t be the primary exception,” they added.
I am with @VitalikButerin on this one.
The one folks whose opinions on #AI scare me are the individuals who argue that “Optimistic Intentions = assure that AI can do no hurt.”
That has been true of completely nothing in human historical past, and this won’t be the primary exception. https://t.co/BVGwPjIbMg
— Emergent Perspective (@_emergent_) November 27, 2023
One other X person voiced different worries about AI. A group member who goes as “Wei Dai” on X mentioned that one among their considerations is that AI could inherently disfavor protection, decentralization and democracy. Based on Dai, AI may speed up the “flawed mental fields,” and people pushing in opposition to it is probably not sufficient.
Associated: How decentralization can mitigate ‘dystopic’ artificial intelligence risks — SingularityNET exec
Not everybody agreed with Buterin’s sentiment. One other group member criticized Buterin and claimed that expertise specialists like Buterin “appear to have a whole disregard or immature view” of human psychology. The group member argued that the motivation behind constructing “morally poor” human experiences is at all times cash. The X person urged the group to know each issues and other people and never only one or the opposite.
the issue with Vitalik’s submit imo:
he has a predefined thought of ‘humanitarian values’
however i dont suppose these are a priori
i imagine the values come after and with the techcfr horse-carriage riders when the motorcar made its intro
normally i believe he is a gud man tho https://t.co/6ZWjWT9fdZ
— 0xBlixa (@0xBlixa) November 28, 2023
In the meantime, a group member additionally argued on X that one of many issues with the weblog submit is Buterin’s predefined thought of humanitarian values. The group member defined that these shouldn’t be predefined and should come after and with the expertise.
Whereas many expressed their settlement and disagreements, others merely sat on the fence, saying they sit up for participating in humanity’s collective effort to seek out the solutions.
Journal: Real AI use cases in crypto, No. 1: The best money for AI is crypto
[ad_2]
Source link
