Home>BLOCKCHAIN>Bitget CEO slams Hyperliquid’s dealing with of “suspicious” incident involving JELLY token
BLOCKCHAIN

Bitget CEO slams Hyperliquid’s dealing with of “suspicious” incident involving JELLY token


Gracy Chen, CEO of cryptocurrency alternate Bitget, criticized Hyperliquid’s dealing with of a March 26 incident on its perpetual alternate, saying it put the community vulnerable to turning into “FTX 2.0.”

On March 26, Hyperliquid, a blockchain community specializing in buying and selling, mentioned it delisted perpetual futures contracts for the JELLY token and would reimburse customers after figuring out “proof of suspicious market exercise” tied to the devices. 

The choice, which was reached by consensus amongst Hyperliquid’s comparatively small variety of validators, flagged present considerations concerning the fashionable community’s perceived centralization.

“Regardless of presenting itself as an revolutionary decentralized alternate with a daring imaginative and prescient, Hyperliquid operates extra like an offshore [centralized exchange],” Chen mentioned, after saying “Hyperliquid could also be on observe to grow to be FTX 2.0.”

FTX was a cryptocurrency alternate run by Sam Bankman-Fried, who was convicted of fraud within the US after FTX’s abrupt collapse in 2022. 

Chen didn't accuse Hyperliquid of particular authorized infractions, as an alternative emphasizing what she thought-about to be Hyperliquid’s “immature, unethical, and unprofessional” response to the occasion.

“The choice to shut the $JELLY market and power settlement of positions at a good value units a harmful precedent,” Chen mentioned. “Belief—not capital—is the inspiration of any alternate […] and as soon as misplaced, it’s virtually unattainable to get better.”

Supply: Gracy Chen

Associated: Hyperliquid delists JELLY perps, citing ‘suspicious’ activity

JELLY incident

The JELLY token was launched in January by Venmo co-founder Iqram Magdon-Ismail as a part of a Web3 social media challenge dubbed JellyJelly. 

It initially reached a market capitalization of roughly $250 million earlier than falling to the one digit thousands and thousands within the ensuing weeks, according to DexScreener. 

On March 26, JELLY’s market cap soared to round $25 million after Binance, the world’s hottest crypto alternate, launched its personal perpetual futures tied to the token. 

The identical day, a Hyperliquid dealer “opened a large $6M brief place on JellyJelly” after which “intentionally self-liquidated by pumping JellyJelly’s value on-chain,” Abhi, founding father of Web3 firm AP Collective, said in an X publish.

BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes mentioned preliminary reactions to Hyperliquid’s JELLY incident overestimated the community’s potential reputational dangers.

“Let’s cease pretending hyperliquid is decentralised. After which cease pretending merchants truly [care],” Hayes said in an X publish. “Wager you $HYPE is again the place [it] began briefly order trigger degens gonna degen.”

Binance launched JELLY perps on March 26. Supply: Binance

Rising pains

On March 12, Hyperliquid grappled with an analogous disaster attributable to a whale who deliberately liquidated a roughly $200 million lengthy Ether (ETH) place. 

The commerce value depositors into Hyperliquid’s liquidity pool, HLP, roughly $4 million in losses after forcing the pool to unwind the commerce at unfavorable costs. Since then, Hyperliquid has increased collateral requirements for open positions to “cut back the systemic affect of huge positions with hypothetical market affect upon closing.” 

Hyperliquid operates the most well-liked leveraged perpetuals buying and selling platform, controlling roughly 70% of market share, based on a January report by asset supervisor VanEck. 

Perpetual futures, or “perps,” are leveraged futures contracts with no expiry date. Merchants deposit margin collateral, reminiscent of USDC, to safe open positions.

According to L2Beat, Hyperliquid has two fundamental validator units, every comprising 4 validators. By comparability, rival chains reminiscent of Solana and Ethereum are supported by roughly 1,000 and 1 million validators, respectively. 

Extra validators usually reduce the danger of a small group of insiders manipulating a blockchain. 

Journal: What are native rollups? Full guide to Ethereum’s latest innovation