The SEC is going through one other defeat in its recycled lawsuit in opposition to Kraken

The authorized duel between america Securities and Trade Fee (SEC) and Kraken, a number one cryptocurrency trade, appears like one other misguided try by the SEC to exert management over an trade that essentially challenges an outdated regulatory playbook. The company’s lawsuit, filed in November, accuses Kraken of operating as an unregistered securities exchange.

The lawsuit isn’t only a repeat of the SEC’s previous failures. It’s additionally a obvious instance of regulatory overreach that fails to understand the essence of cryptocurrency. It mirrors the company’s actions in opposition to Coinbase, which mark a sample of aggressive regulation that’s each ineffectual and counterproductive. In its case in opposition to Coinbase, the SEC allegations equally concerned working as an unregistered securities trade. The strategy essentially misunderstands the character of cryptocurrency exchanges.

The lawsuit isn’t only a repeat of the SEC’s previous failures. It’s additionally a obvious instance of regulatory overreach that fails to understand the essence of cryptocurrency. It mirrors the company’s actions in opposition to Coinbase, which mark a sample of aggressive regulation that’s each ineffectual and counterproductive. In its case in opposition to Coinbase, the SEC allegations equally concerned working as an unregistered securities trade. The strategy essentially misunderstands the character of cryptocurrency exchanges.

Associated: Expect some crypto companies to fail in the wake of Bitcoin’s halving

Not like conventional securities exchanges, platforms like Kraken supply a various vary of digital belongings that don’t match neatly into the securities framework. This misclassification by the SEC reveals a lack of knowledge of the distinctive traits of cryptocurrencies, which perform as decentralized belongings, typically with utility or currency-like options somewhat than typical securities.

One of the vital placing points is the absence of technological neutrality — the precept that regulatory frameworks ought to apply equally to all types of expertise, with out favoring or penalizing any explicit one. By forcing cryptocurrencies into the standard securities mildew, the SEC will not be solely misapplying legal guidelines but in addition displaying a transparent bias in opposition to digital belongings. This lack of neutrality not solely hinders innovation but in addition unfairly targets platforms which are striving to work throughout the regulatory panorama.

The SEC’s aggressive stance dangers driving enterprise away from the U.S. to extra crypto-friendly jurisdictions. This phenomenon, generally known as regulatory arbitrage, might end result within the U.S. dropping its place as a pacesetter in technological innovation. The crypto trade is world, and extreme regulation in a single nation merely pushes companies to relocate, taking their financial advantages and improvements with them.

Associated: 3 theses that will drive Ethereum and Bitcoin in the next bull market

The Kraken lawsuit is about to develop into one other instance of the SEC’s failure to efficiently regulate the crypto trade, akin to the result of its actions in opposition to Coinbase. This repetitive cycle of aggressive and misinformed regulation will not be solely futile but in addition dangerous to the credibility of the SEC. It sends a message that the regulatory physique is extra curious about flexing its regulatory muscle than in understanding and adapting to new technological paradigms.

The case isn’t simply an remoted authorized battle. It’s indicative of a broader situation throughout the U.S. regulatory framework’s strategy to cryptocurrencies. The SEC should transfer past its present, outdated ways and have interaction with the crypto trade in a extra knowledgeable and constructive method. Regulation is important, however it have to be affordable, well-informed, and designed to foster innovation, not stifle it.

It appears the SEC is about for an additional resounding defeat, which is able to function another reminder of the necessity for a brand new strategy by regulators.

This text is for basic data functions and isn’t meant to be and shouldn’t be taken as authorized or funding recommendation. The views, ideas and opinions expressed listed below are the creator’s alone and don’t essentially mirror or characterize the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.